Economic and Environmental Scenario Analysis of a Finnish Wood-based Case Building
Received: 15 January 2025 | Revised: 7 February 2025 | Accepted: 9 February 2025
Corresponding author: Ali Amiri
Abstract
The construction industry is a major contributor to Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, highlighting the need for more sustainable building practices. While building costs often drive project decision-making, environmental impacts from material production to building operation are considered equally significant. Wood has emerged as a viable alternative to traditional construction materials, offering reduced carbon emissions and potential cost savings. This study aims to assess the environmental and economic performance of a wooden-framed educational building in Finland, with a focus on life-cycle carbon emissions and cost-effectiveness. The case building is a single-story structure with glulam external walls, beams, and columns. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and cost analysis has been conducted using LCA tools provided by the Finnish Ministry of Environment, alongside a comparative scenario analysis involving alternative structural materials. Three alternative scenarios have been designed with different materials utilized for external walls and the structure, i.e., beams and columns. The findings reveal that wood-based structures can achieve substantial reductions in carbon emissions while remaining cost-competitive, particularly in early life-cycle stages compared to conventional reinforced concrete options. The results of this study partially challenge the widely recognized barrier to adopting greener building practices, namely the incremental cost of sustainable construction. Additionally, scenario analysis highlights the potential for hybrid structural systems to balance environmental benefits with economic feasibility. This research contributes practical insights into how contractors and policymakers can adopt wood and hybrid materials to support low-carbon construction goals.
Keywords:
life cycle assessment, greenhouse gas, timber construction, low-carbon material, cost analysisDownloads
References
J. E. Anderson, G. Wulfhorst, and W. Lang, "Energy analysis of the built environment—A review and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 44, pp. 149–158, Apr. 2015.
Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision-Makers. Paris, France: nited Nations Environment Programme, 2009.
Common carbon metric for measuring energy use and reporting greenhouse gas emissions from building operations. Paris, France: United Nations Environment Programme, 2010.
E. Nykänen et al., Puurakentaminen Euroopassa LeanWOOD. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2017.
I. Talvitie, A. Kinnunen, A. Amiri, and S. Junnila, "Can future cities grow a carbon storage equal to forests?," Environmental Research Letters, vol. 18, Dec. 2023, Art. no. 044029.
E. Bartlett and N. Howard, "Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building," Building Research & Information, vol. 28, no. 5–6, pp. 315–324, Oct. 2010.
C. K. Chau, T. M. Leung, and W. Y. Ng, "A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings," Applied Energy, vol. 143, pp. 395–413, Apr. 2015.
J. Monahan and J. C. Powell, "An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study using a lifecycle assessment framework," Energy and Buildings, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 179–188, Jan. 2011.
O. Afana, R. A. Zubaidi, S. A. Dabous, and F. Ibrahim, "Categories and Factors of Cost Overrun in Construction Projects: A Systematic Review," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 18330–18347, Dec. 2024.
J. Kneifel, "Life-cycle carbon and cost analysis of energy efficiency measures in new commercial buildings," Energy and Buildings, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 333–340, Mar. 2010.
A. B. Robertson, F. C. F. Lam, and R. J. Cole, "A Comparative Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Mid-Rise Office Building Construction Alternatives: Laminated Timber or Reinforced Concrete," Buildings, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 245–270, Jul. 2012.
H. R. Lu, A. El Hanandeh, and B. P. Gilbert, "A comparative life cycle study of alternative materials for Australian multi-storey apartment building frame constructions: Environmental and economic perspective," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 166, pp. 458–473, Nov. 2017.
L. Gustavsson and R. Sathre, "Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials," Building and Environment, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 940–951, Jul. 2006.
J. Ottelin, A. Amiri, B. Steubing, and S. Junnila, "Comparative carbon footprint analysis of residents of wooden and non-wooden houses in Finland," Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 7, Jun. 2021, Art. no. 074006.
A. Amiri, J. Ottelin, J. Sorvari, and S. Junnila, "Cities as carbon sinks—classification of wooden buildings," Environmental Research Letters, vol. 15, no. 9, Aug. 2020, Art. no. 094076.
T. Häkkinen and K. Belloni, "Barriers and drivers for sustainable building," Building Research & Information, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 239–255, Apr. 2011.
P. D. Kremer and L. Ritchie, "Understanding Costs and Identifying Value in Mass Timber Construction: Calculating the ‘Total Cost of Project’ (TCP)," Mass Timber Construction Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–18, Oct. 2018.
R. Sathre and L. Gustavsson, "Using wood products to mitigate climate change: External costs and structural change," Applied Energy, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 251–257, Feb. 2009.
Y. Takva, C. Takva, and F. Goksen, "A Contemporary House Proposal: Structural Analysis of Wood and Steel Bungalows," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 11032–11035, Jun. 2023.
"Myrskylä School | Myrskylä Municipality," https://myrskyla.fi/palvelut/varhaiskasvatus-koulutus/koulut/kirkonkylan-koulu/.
J. Švajlenka, M. Kozlovská, and M. Spišáková, "The benefits of modern method of construction based on wood in the context of sustainability," International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1591–1602, Aug. 2017.
O. Ortiz, J. C. Pasqualino, G. Díez, and F. Castells, "The environmental impact of the construction phase: An application to composite walls from a life cycle perspective," Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 832–840, Sep. 2010.
M. Rehm and R. Ade, "Construction costs comparison between ‘green’ and conventional office buildings," Building Research & Information, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 198–208, Apr. 2013.
L. Zhang, J. Wu, and H. Liu, "Turning green into gold: A review on the economics of green buildings," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 172, pp. 2234–2245, Jan. 2018.
M. H. Issa, J. H. Rankin, and A. J. Christian, "Canadian practitioners’ perception of research work investigating the cost premiums, long-term costs and health and productivity benefits of green buildings," Building and Environment, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1698–1711, Jul. 2010.
X. Zhang, A. Platten, and L. Shen, "Green property development practice in China: Costs and barriers," Building and Environment, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 2153–2160, Nov. 2011.
B.-G. Hwang and J. S. Tan, "Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 335–349, 2012.
X. Zhang, W. Huang, M. Khajehpour, M. Asgari, and T. Tannert, "Seismic Performance and LCA Comparison between Concrete and Timber–Concrete Hybrid Buildings," Buildings, vol. 13, no. 7, Jul. 2023, Art. no. 1714.
J. Zuo et al., "Green building evaluation from a life-cycle perspective in Australia: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 70, pp. 358–368, Apr. 2017.
X. Zhang and F. Wang, "Hybrid input-output analysis for life-cycle energy consumption and carbon emissions of China’s building sector," Building and Environment, vol. 104, pp. 188–197, Aug. 2016.
A. J. Hoffman and R. Henn, "Overcoming the Social and Psychological Barriers to Green Building," Organization & Environment, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 390–419, Oct. 2008.
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Amiri, Anni Hatakka, Seppo Junnila
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after its publication in ETASR with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
