Enhancing Mortar Mechanical Properties Using Bacterial Nanocellulose as an Additive: A Comparative Study of Electrolysis and Mechanical Production Methods

Authors

  • Lisa Oksri Nelfia Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3783-4888
  • Sahid R. Albany Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
  • Ananto Nugroho Directorate for Laboratory Management, Research Facilities, and Science and Technology Park, Deputy for Research and Infrastructure, BRIN, Cibinong, Indonesia
  • Triastuti Research Center for Biomass and Bioproducts, BRIN, Cibinong, Indonesia
  • Astri Rinanti Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Technology, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-6307
  • Ouali Amiri Laboratoire GeM, Nantes Universite, Polytech Nantes, Saint-Nazaire, France https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3775-8355
Volume: 16 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 35491-35499 | June 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.14610

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the impact of Bacterial Nanocellulose (BNC) produced via electrolysis and mechanical methods on the mechanical properties of cement composites. The experimental research involved pulverizing cellulose using both mechanical and electrolysis methods. Flexural strength and compressive strength tests were conducted in accordance with the standards. The results showed that adding BNC at 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.2% by weight of cement, regardless of the production method, reduced mortar flow by 1.21%-4.55% as the dosage increased. The nanocellulose’s ability to retain water reduced the mortar's workability, decreasing specific gravity by 1.35%-5.35% compared to the control. Both production methods consistently increased the mortar's flexural strength as the additive dose increased. The highest flexural strength, 8.33 MPa, was achieved at 28 days with a 0.2% dosage of mechanical method nanocellulose, showing a 51.73% improvement over the control. Regarding compressive strength, the 0.05% dosage at 7 days increased it, whereas higher doses (0.1% and 0.2%) decreased it. However, at 28 days, the compressive strength improved linearly with increasing dosage, ranging from 3.76% to 15.75% higher than the control. Thus, BNC, particularly at a 0.2% dosage via the mechanical method, is a promising additive for enhancing mortar's mechanical properties. The novelty of this research lies in the direct comparison of BNC produced by electrolysis and mechanical methods as mortar additives, revealing distinct microstructural and mechanical outcomes that depend on the production method.

Keywords:

bacterial nanocellulose, composite cement, mechanical properties

References

B. Y. Nabiilah, L. O. Nelfia, and S. Astutiningsih, "An Innovation of High Performance Concrete by Replacing Cement with Nickel Slag Powder," International Journal on Livable Space, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 77–83, Sept. 2019.

L. O. Nilfia et al., "Comprehensive Characteristics of High-Performance Concrete with Nickel Slag as Fine and Coarse Aggregate," International Journal of Technology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1613–1631, Dec. 2024.

Anisah, L. Letournel, A. M. Salsabila, Y. Luthfiana, and N. Anisa, "Composition of Chemical Ingredients in Sugarcane Bagasse Ash with Variation of Final Calcination Temperature," Jurnal Pensil : Pendidikan Teknik Sipil, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 187–195, May 2023.

R. Singh and R. K. Singh, "A Review on Nano Materials of Carbon," IOSR Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 42–57, Dec. 2017.

A. Nugroho, Triastuti, S. Sufiandi, and A. Z. Syahrial, "Wood Veneer Reinforced with Bacterial Cellulose: Tensile Strength and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis," International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 327–333, 2022.

F. Sanchez and K. Sobolev, "Nanotechnology in concrete – A review," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2060–2071, Nov. 2010.

S. A. Shakrani, A. Ayob, M. A. A. Rahim, and S. Alias, "Performance of nano materials in pervious concrete pavement: A review", AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2030, no. 1, Nov. 2018, Art. no. 020008.

M. Szafraniec, E. Grabias-Blicharz, D. Barnat-Hunek, and E. N. Landis, "A Critical Review on Modification Methods of Cement Composites with Nanocellulose and Reaction Conditions during Nanocellulose Production," Materials, vol. 15, no. 21, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 7706.

K. S. Kamasamudram, W. Ashraf, and E. N. Landis, "Cellulose Nanocomposites for Performance Enhancement of Ordinary Portland Cement-Based Materials," Transportation Research Record, vol. 2675, no. 9, pp. 11–20, Sept. 2021.

M. A. Akhlaghi, R. Bagherpour, and H. Kalhori, "Application of bacterial nanocellulose fibers as reinforcement in cement composites," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 241, Apr. 2020, Art. no. 118061.

P. R. Chawla, I. B. Bajaj, S. A. Survase, and R. S. Singhal, "Microbial Cellulose: Fermentative Production and Applications," Food Engineering and Technology Department, Institute of Chemical Technology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 107–124, 2009.

F. Mohammadkazemi, R. Aguiar, and N. Cordeiro, "Improvement of bagasse fiber–cement composites by addition of bacterial nanocellulose: an inverse gas chromatography study," Cellulose, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1803–1814, Apr. 2017.

O. A. Hisseine, W. Wilson, L. Sorelli, B. Tolnai, and A. Tagnit-Hamou, "Nanocellulose for improved concrete performance: A macro-to-micro investigation for disclosing the effects of cellulose filaments on strength of cement systems," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 206, pp. 84–96, May 2019.

D. A. Gregory et al., "Bacterial cellulose: A smart biomaterial with diverse applications," Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, vol. 145, July 2021, Art. no. 100623.

A. Balea, E. Fuente, A. Blanco, and C. Negro, "Nanocelluloses: Natural-Based Materials for Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composites. A Critical Review," Polymers, vol. 11, no. 3, Mar. 2019, Art. no. 518.

M. I. Haque, W. Ashraf, R. I. Khan, and S. Shah, "A comparative investigation on the effects of nanocellulose from bacteria and plant-based sources for cementitious composites," Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 125, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 104316.

S. A. Miller, V. M. John, S. A. Pacca, and A. Horvath, "Carbon dioxide reduction potential in the global cement industry by 2050," Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 114, pp. 115–124, Dec. 2018.

ASTM C109/C109M-11b Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). USA: ASTM International, 2023.

ASTM C349-18 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars (Using Portions of Prisms Broken in Flexure). USA: ASTM International, 2025.

ASTM C348-21 Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars. USA: ASTM International, 2021.

ASTM C188-15 Standard Test Method for Density of Hydraulic Cement. USA: ASTM International, 2016.

O. D. Frutos, G. Quijano, A. Aizpuru, and R. Muñoz, "A state-of-the-art review on nitrous oxide control from waste treatment and industrial sources," Biotechnology Advances, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1025–1037, July 2018.

O. Onuaguluchi and N. Banthia, "Sulfate resistance of cement composites containing Nano-Fibrillated Cellulose (NFC)," Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 135, Jan. 2023, Art. no. 104831.

H. Ibrahim et al., "Nanocellulose-Based Adsorbent for Cu(II) Adsorption," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 15338–15343, Aug. 2024.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
L. O. Nelfia, S. R. Albany, A. Nugroho, Triastuti, A. Rinanti, and O. Amiri, “Enhancing Mortar Mechanical Properties Using Bacterial Nanocellulose as an Additive: A Comparative Study of Electrolysis and Mechanical Production Methods”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 35491–35499, Jun. 2026.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 32
PDF Downloads: 8

Metrics Information