A Plant Design Heuristic Considering the Eventual Measurement of Currently Unknown Variables
Received: 18 December 2024 | Revised: 28 January 2025 | Accepted: 7 February 2025 | Online: 3 April 2025
Corresponding author: Mario Luis Chew Hernandez
Abstract
It is common practice for chemical plants to be sized using estimated parameter values that are uncertain at the design stage, but whose true values will be known once the plant is in operation. Moreover, not all design decisions are fixed once the plant is built, as some may be adjusted during operation. In this paper, we present a heuristic method for plant design under uncertainty that takes these characteristics into account. The problem is framed as selecting the best from a set of candidate designs, where each candidate design results from optimizing the plant for a set of possible values of the uncertain variables. Decision trees are used to select the best-performing alternative given the probability distribution of the uncertainties. A working example is presented that relates to the design of a heat-integrated reactor with uncertainty in the plant inlet composition. Candidate designs and optimal operation for different compositions are found by using the Solver add-in of MS Excel. It is concluded that decision trees allow post-construction operational adjustments and parameter uncertainties to be easily and clearly incorporated into the design process.
Keywords:
uncertainty, chemical plant design, optimization, decision treesDownloads
References
W. D. Seider, J. D. Seader, and D. R. Lewin, Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis and Evaluation, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
H. A. Taha, Operations Research: An Introduction, 9th ed. London, UK: Pearson, 2010.
R. Howard and A. Abbas, Foundations of Decision Analysis, 1st ed. London, UK: Pearson, 2015.
M. Martín, "Methodology for solar and wind energy chemical storage facilities design under uncertainty: Methanol production from CO2 and hydrogen," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 92, pp. 43–54, Sep. 2016.
C. A. Salman, E. Thorin, and J. Yan, "Uncertainty and influence of input parameters and assumptions on the design and analysis of thermochemical waste conversion processes: A stochastic approach," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 214, Jun. 2020, Art. no. 112867.
D. Previtali, F. Rossi, G. Reklaitis, and F. Manenti, "Multi-objective Optimization under Uncertainty of Novel CHPC Process," in Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, vol. 48, S. Pierucci, F. Manenti, G. L. Bozzano, and D. Manca, Eds. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2020, pp. 427–432.
H. Teichgraeber and A. R. Brandt, "Optimal design of an electricity-intensive industrial facility subject to electricity price uncertainty: Stochastic optimization and scenario reduction," Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 163, pp. 204–216, Nov. 2020.
F. Ahmad, N. Ahmad, and A. A. Z. Al-Khazaal, "Machine Learning-assisted Prediction and Optimization of Exergy Efficiency and Destruction of Cumene Plant under Uncertainty," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 12892–12899, Feb. 2024.
A. Palazoglu and Y. Arkun, "A multiobjective approach to design chemical plants with robust dynamic operability characteristics," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 567–575, 1986.
S. S. Bahakim and L. A. Ricardez-Sandoval, "Simultaneous design and MPC-based control for dynamic systems under uncertainty: A stochastic approach," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 63, pp. 66–81, Apr. 2014.
U. Hauptmanns, "Uncertainty and the calculation of safety-related parameters for chemical reactions," Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 243–247, Jul. 1997.
A. Lemita, S. Boulahbel, and S. Kahla, "Gradient Descent Optimization Control of an Activated Sludge Process based on Radial Basis Function Neural Network," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 6080–6086, Aug. 2020.
L. Sun and H. H. Lou, "A Strategy for Multi-objective Optimization under Uncertainty in Chemical Process Design*," Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 39–42, Feb. 2008.
S. S. Bahakim and L. A. Ricardez-Sandoval, "Optimal Steady-state Design of a Post-combustion CO2 Capture Plant Under Uncertainty," Energy Procedia, vol. 63, pp. 1608–1616, 2014.
E. Ramin et al., "Plant-wide assessment of alternative activated sludge configurations for biological nutrient removal under uncertain influent characteristics," Science of The Total Environment, vol. 822, May 2022, Art. no. 153678.
T. Li, J. Long, L. Zhao, W. Du, and F. Qian, "A bilevel data-driven framework for robust optimization under uncertainty – applied to fluid catalytic cracking unit," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 166, Oct. 2022, Art. no. 107989.
G. Carnio, A. Di Pretoro, M. Fedeli, and L. Montastruc, "Plantwide flexibility analysis of a biogas to methanol process: Assessing the implications of uncertainties on process duties and emissions," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 187, Aug. 2024, Art. no. 108737.
C. M. Marques, S. Moniz, J. P. de Sousa, and A. P. Barbosa-Póvoa, "A simulation-optimization approach to integrate process design and planning decisions under technical and market uncertainties: A case from the chemical-pharmaceutical industry," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 106, pp. 796–813, Nov. 2017.
Y. Chen, Y. Ye, Z. Yuan, I. E. Grossmann, and B. Chen, "Integrating stochastic programming and reliability in the optimal synthesis of chemical processes," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 157, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 107616.
Y. Chen, Y. Ye, I. E. Grossmann, and B. Chen, "Integrating Reliability and Uncertainty in Process Synthesis," in Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, vol. 50, M. Türkay and R. Gani, Eds. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2021, pp. 107–113.
P. L. T. Duong, L. Q. Minh, T. N. Pham, J. Goncalves, E. Kwok, and M. Lee, "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of complex chemical processes with a large number of input parameters using compressive polynomial chaos," Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 115, pp. 204–213, Nov. 2016.
W. Ali, P. L. T. Duong, M. S. Khan, M. Getu, and M. Lee, "Measuring the reliability of a natural gas refrigeration plant: Uncertainty propagation and quantification with polynomial chaos expansion based sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 172, pp. 103–117, Apr. 2018.
P. Lotz, L. Bosetti, A. Bardow, S. Lucia, and S. Engell, "Design of chemical recycling processes for PUR foam under uncertainty," in Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, vol. 53, F. Manenti and G. V. Reklaitis, Eds. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2024, pp. 1471–1476.
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mario Luis Chew Hernandez, Verónica Velazquez Romero, Gisela Janeth Espinosa Martinez, Guadalupe Bosques Brugada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after its publication in ETASR with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
